
SamsungNew Model SoonNew Model Expected Soon — Wait if you can
Galaxy A55
Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. This does not influence our editorial recommendations. Learn more about how we make money
Clara’s Verdict
Very GoodGreat value for families and everyday users who want a reliable phone without breaking the bank.
Best for: Budget-conscious families, Everyday users who need a dependable phone, Anyone who wants a big, colorful screen, People who value design and battery life over cutting-edge power
Skip if: Mobile gamers wanting high performance, Photography enthusiasts, People who need the latest processing power
Ethan’s Verdict
GoodDecent display and battery can't overcome weak processing power, inconsistent cameras, and mediocre charging in a crowded budget segment.
Best for: Users who prioritize screen size over performance, People in markets outside the U.S., Casual users who don't game or multitask
Skip if: Anyone needing reliable camera performance, Gaming or heavy multitasking users, U.S. buyers (not available here anyway)
Clara’s Pros & Cons
- +Beautiful, vibrant display that's bright outside
- +Premium design that looks way more expensive
- +All-day battery life for everyday use
- +Excellent value for the price point
- −Camera oversaturates in bright sunlight
- −Processing power isn't great for gaming
- −Glossy back picks up fingerprints easily
- −No wireless charging, slower wired charging
Ethan’s Pros & Cons
- +Vibrant Super AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate
- +Solid battery life exceeding seven hours of screen time
- +IP67 rating and expandable storage included
- +Aggressive pricing in most markets
- −Exynos 1380 processor is underpowered for the price tier
- −Camera inconsistency, especially in bright sunlight and ultrawide
- −25W charging is slow; no wireless charging option
- −Shorter software support window than direct competitors
Score Breakdown
Performance6.510% wt
Display8.515% wt
Camera7.020% wt
Battery Life7.515% wt
Design & Build8.020% wt
Software & Features7.010% wt
Value8.510% wt
Score Breakdown
Performance5.520% wt
Display8.015% wt
Camera6.015% wt
Battery Life7.515% wt
Design & Build7.010% wt
Software & Features6.515% wt
Value8.510% wt
Clara’s Full Review
Real Talk: Is the Galaxy A55 Worth It?
Honestly, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a smart choice if you're looking for a reliable phone that won't drain your wallet. At around $450, you're getting a ton of value for everyday users and families.
The first thing you'll notice is that gorgeous 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display. It's vibrant, colorful, and bright enough to actually see outside during the day, which is huge when you're trying to snap photos at the park or check your phone during carpool. Scrolling through Instagram or watching videos feels smooth thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
What I appreciate about the design is that it feels premium. The phone looks sleek and modern, and it's got an IP67 rating so you don't have to panic if it gets splashed or dropped on a carpeted floor. The only catch is the glossy back, which is a fingerprint magnet. You'll definitely want a case.
For everyday performance, this phone absolutely works. Apps open quickly, texting and browsing are smooth, and you won't have any issues with normal daily tasks. If you're a casual gamer or someone who does heavy multitasking, you might notice it's not as snappy as pricier phones, but for most families, it's totally fine.
The battery is solid. Reviewers found it easily lasts more than seven hours of actual screen time, which means you're getting through a full day with normal use. It won't last two days, but it's dependable. Charging takes about an hour and a half with the 25W charger, and there's no wireless charging, which is a minor bummer at this price point.
The camera is where things get a little complicated. The 50MP main camera captures detailed photos with nice colors, but Samsung's signature oversaturation shows up, especially in bright sunlight where photos can blow out. The macro camera is surprisingly sharp, and it does well in low light. For family snapshots and everyday photos, it's perfectly fine. Just don't expect flagship-level consistency.
In real life, this is a phone that simply works. It's not the fastest, doesn't have the best camera, and won't turn heads with specs. But it looks great, feels solid, lasts all day, and costs way less than flagships. For busy parents and budget-conscious families who just need a dependable phone that takes decent photos and doesn't quit on you, this is genuinely a great choice.
The Bottom Line
The Galaxy A55 is proof that you don't need to spend $1,000 to get a phone that works beautifully in real life. It's a solid, reliable everyday phone that delivers on the basics and looks way more expensive than it costs.
Ethan’s Full Review
The A55 Is Cheaper, Not Better
Samsung's pricing strategy for the Galaxy A55 is transparent: undercut competitors on price, not performance. At $400-465, it's positioned as an accessible entry point. The problem is that "accessible" doesn't mean "good."
Let's start with the processor. The Exynos 1380 delivers single-core performance of 1,161 and multi-core of 3,464. That's not competitive. For context, phones at this price point from OnePlus and Google offer noticeably better performance. Samsung is essentially asking you to accept a slower device because the display is nice. That's a poor trade.
The display itself is legitimately strong. The 6.5-inch Super AMOLED panel with 1,000 nits peak brightness and 120Hz adaptive refresh is the kind of component you'd expect in a $600 phone. It's vibrant, responsive, and suitable for video and gaming. This is where Samsung clearly allocated its component budget.
The camera tells a familiar story: good on paper, inconsistent in practice. The 50MP main sensor produces detailed shots with solid exposures in ideal conditions, but reviewers consistently flag oversaturation and poor dynamic range in bright sunlight. The 12MP ultrawide exaggerates colors and loses brightness compared to the Pixel 8A. The 5MP macro is filler. You're looking at a camera system that feels like it was designed in 2022, not 2024.
Battery life is respectable. Seven-plus hours of screen time meets the "good enough" bar for most users. But the 25W charging speed is mediocre, and the absence of wireless charging is a cost-cutting measure that stings at this price. You're waiting 1 hour 23 minutes for a full charge, which is slow by 2024 standards.
Here's what really matters for long-term ownership: software support. CNET flags that the A55 gets four years of Android updates while the Pixel 8A gets five. That might sound minor, but it directly impacts resale value and how long you'll actually want to keep the phone. Samsung is optimizing for short upgrade cycles, which isn't in your favor.
The real issue is positioning. At $400, the A55 competes against the Pixel 8A and OnePlus 12R. The Pixel 8A has better cameras, longer software support, and competitive battery life. The OnePlus 12R crushes it on performance. The A55 wins on display quality and design, but that's not enough to overcome fundamental performance and camera weaknesses.
Bottom line: this is a phone for people who value screen real estate and don't care about processing power or camera consistency. If you're willing to accept those compromises for the price, it's defensible. But there are better options at the same cost.
Specifications
| os | Android 14 |
| camera | Triple 64MP + 12MP + 5MP |
| battery | 5000mAh |
| display | 6.5-inch Super AMOLED |
| storage | 128GB, 256GB |
| processor | Exynos 1380 |
Overall Rating
Related Reviews
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs iPhone 17 vs Pixel 10 Pro XL: Which Flagship Wins?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes the crown with its stunning display, versatile cameras, and complete feature set. See how it beats iPhone 17 and Pixel 10 Pro XL.
Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro: Which $999 Flagship Wins?
Google Pixel 9 Pro and Apple iPhone 16 Pro both cost $999, but only one deserves your money. We compare cameras, performance, and value to pick a winner.
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: Which Flagship Wins?
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra head-to-head. We compare cameras, performance, displays, and value to crown the ultimate flagship winner.
Review History
Initial review from real source data
Initial review from real source data
Editorial Independence
Our reviews are based on research from trusted expert sources. We may earn commissions from affiliate links, but this never influences our ratings or recommendations. How we score · Editorial policy · Report an error
Related Smartphones
SamsungDeals LikelyNewer model likely available — look for deals on this one
Galaxy S25 Ultra
Lowest Price Vendor Auto-Selected
Lowest Price Vendor Auto-Selected



